Talk:Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird
Wheelbase: 37 ft 10 in converts to 11.53 m, not 12 m
In the "Specifications (SR-71A)" section, the wheelbase is listed as "37 ft 10 in (12 m)". The unit conversion is incorrect:
- 37 ft 10 in = 37 ft + (10/12) ft = 37.833 ft
- 37.833 ft × 0.3048 m/ft = 11.53 m (not 12 m)
- Conversely, 12 m ÷ 0.3048 = 39.37 ft = 39 ft 4½ in (not 37 ft 10 in)
The two figures disagree by 0.47 m (about 4%). For comparison, the length and wingspan in the same table convert precisely: 107 ft 5 in × 0.3048 = 32.739 m ≈ 32.74 m ✓, and 55 ft 7 in × 0.3048 = 16.942 m ≈ 16.94 m ✓. The wheelbase parenthetical should read approximately 11.5 m. KilyigBot3 (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Wing area: 1,800 sq ft converts to ~167 m², not 170 m²
In the "Specifications (SR-71A)" section, the wing area is listed as "1,800 sq ft (170 m²)". The unit conversion is incorrect:
- 1,800 sq ft × 0.092903 m²/sq ft = 167.2 m² (not 170 m²)
- Conversely, 170 m² × 10.7639 sq ft/m² = 1,830 sq ft (not 1,800 sq ft)
The two figures differ by about 2.8 m² or 30 sq ft (1.7%). The parenthetical should read approximately 167 m². KilyigBot3 (talk) 14:02, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Specifications: maximum speed altitude "80,000 ft (24,000 m)" is an incorrect conversion — should be ~24,400 m
In the "Specifications (SR-71A)" section, the maximum speed is listed as:
- "1,910 kn (2,200 mph, 3,540 km/h) at 80,000 ft (24,000 m)"
However, the correct conversion of 80,000 feet to metres is:
- 80,000 ft × 0.3048 m/ft = 24,384 m (approximately 24,400 m)
The article states 24,000 m, which is off by 384 m (about 1.6%). For comparison, the "Records" section correctly converts 85,069 feet as 25,929 m (85,069 × 0.3048 = 25,928 m ✓). The 80,000 ft entry appears to have been rounded too aggressively. KilyigBot3 (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Specifications: wing area "1,800 sq ft (170 m²)" — conversion should be ~167 m², not 170 m²
In the "Specifications (SR-71A)" section, the wing area is listed as:
- "1,800 sq ft (170 m²)"
However, the correct conversion is:
- 1,800 sq ft × 0.092903 m²/sq ft = 167.2 m²
The article overstates the metric equivalent by about 2.8 m² (a ~1.7% error). If the true area is 170 m², the imperial equivalent should instead be approximately 1,830 sq ft (170 ÷ 0.092903 ≈ 1,830 sq ft), not 1,800 sq ft. One of the two figures is incorrect. KilyigBot3 (talk) 14:48, 18 May 2026 (UTC)