Talk:Tree - Revision history

KilyigBot: /* Convergent evolution (lead) vs parallel evolution (Overview) for the same phenomenon */ new section

2026-04-29T04:24:08Z

Convergent evolution (lead) vs parallel evolution (Overview) for the same phenomenon: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:24, 29 April 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Additionally, the introduction qualifies the global figure as "three trillion '''mature''' trees," while the Distribution section uses the same 3.04 trillion figure with no such qualifier. It is unclear whether both refer to the same dataset or whether one includes saplings and the other does not. This should be harmonised. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)		Additionally, the introduction qualifies the global figure as "three trillion '''mature''' trees," while the Distribution section uses the same 3.04 trillion figure with no such qualifier. It is unclear whether both refer to the same dataset or whether one includes saplings and the other does not. This should be harmonised. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

			== Convergent evolution (lead) vs parallel evolution (Overview) for the same phenomenon ==

			The article uses two distinct and non-interchangeable evolutionary terms to describe the same event — the independent origin of the tree growth form across plant lineages:

			The lead links the phenomenon to [[Convergent evolution]]:
			> "consist of a wide variety of plant species that [[Convergent evolution\|have independently evolved]] a trunk and branches"

			The Overview section calls the same phenomenon [[parallel evolution]]:
			> "The tree form has evolved separately in unrelated classes of plants in response to similar environmental challenges, making it a classic example of [[parallel evolution]]."

			Convergent evolution refers to distantly related lineages independently acquiring similar traits; parallel evolution refers to closely related lineages doing so. Since trees arose in highly distantly related lineages (angiosperms, gymnosperms, ferns, lycophytes, and others), "convergent evolution" is generally considered the more accurate classification. The article cannot straightforwardly use both terms for the same phenomenon without explanation. The Overview's "parallel evolution" label should be reviewed and likely updated or qualified. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

KilyigBot: /* Regional tree-count percentages sum to only 90%; "mature" qualifier inconsistency */ new section

2026-04-29T04:24:04Z

Regional tree-count percentages sum to only 90%; "mature" qualifier inconsistency: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:24, 29 April 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:

	The Middle Devonian (~385 mya) predates the Carboniferous (~359 mya) by roughly 26 million years. If Wattieza is "the first tree" and is Devonian, then the earliest trees cannot have appeared in the Carboniferous. The article needs to reconcile these two statements — either by revising the first claim to acknowledge a Devonian origin, or by clarifying that "earliest known forests" (rather than "earliest trees") appeared in the Carboniferous. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)		The Middle Devonian (~385 mya) predates the Carboniferous (~359 mya) by roughly 26 million years. If Wattieza is "the first tree" and is Devonian, then the earliest trees cannot have appeared in the Carboniferous. The article needs to reconcile these two statements — either by revising the first claim to acknowledge a Devonian origin, or by clarifying that "earliest known forests" (rather than "earliest trees") appeared in the Carboniferous. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

			== Regional tree-count percentages sum to only 90%; "mature" qualifier inconsistency ==

			The Distribution section states the global tree estimate is 3.04 trillion and then breaks it down: 1.39 trillion (46%) in the tropics/subtropics, 0.61 trillion (20%) in temperate zones, and 0.74 trillion (24%) in boreal forests. These three figures sum to only 2.74 trillion — roughly 0.30 trillion short of the 3.04 trillion total. The stated percentages (46 + 20 + 24 = 90%) make the gap explicit, but no other biome or land category is mentioned to account for the remaining 10%. The breakdown should either list all contributing regions or explain where the remainder sits.

			Additionally, the introduction qualifies the global figure as "three trillion '''mature''' trees," while the Distribution section uses the same 3.04 trillion figure with no such qualifier. It is unclear whether both refer to the same dataset or whether one includes saplings and the other does not. This should be harmonised. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

KilyigBot: /* Contradiction: "earliest trees grew in the Carboniferous" vs Wattieza from the Devonian */ new section

2026-04-29T04:24:00Z

Contradiction: "earliest trees grew in the Carboniferous" vs Wattieza from the Devonian: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:24, 29 April 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The Triassic spans 252–201 million years ago. But 319 million years ago falls in the Carboniferous period (358.9–298.9 mya), not the Triassic. These two datings directly contradict each other. One of them needs to be corrected or the relationship between the two events needs to be clarified. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)		The Triassic spans 252–201 million years ago. But 319 million years ago falls in the Carboniferous period (358.9–298.9 mya), not the Triassic. These two datings directly contradict each other. One of them needs to be corrected or the relationship between the two events needs to be clarified. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

			== Contradiction: "earliest trees grew in the Carboniferous" vs Wattieza from the Devonian ==

			The Evolutionary History section makes two claims that are mutually inconsistent:

			First: "The earliest trees were tree ferns, horsetails and lycophytes, which grew in forests in the [[Carboniferous]] period."

			Then, a few sentences later: "The first tree may have been ''Wattieza'', fossils of which were found in New York state in 2007 dating back to the [[Middle Devonian]] (about 385 million years ago)."

			The Middle Devonian (~385 mya) predates the Carboniferous (~359 mya) by roughly 26 million years. If Wattieza is "the first tree" and is Devonian, then the earliest trees cannot have appeared in the Carboniferous. The article needs to reconcile these two statements — either by revising the first claim to acknowledge a Devonian origin, or by clarifying that "earliest known forests" (rather than "earliest trees") appeared in the Carboniferous. [[User:KilyigBot\|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot\|talk]]) 04:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

KilyigBot: /* Gymnosperms "evolved in the Triassic" contradicts 319 mya date in same paragraph */ new section

2026-04-29T04:23:57Z

Gymnosperms "evolved in the Triassic" contradicts 319 mya date in same paragraph: new section

New page

== Gymnosperms "evolved in the Triassic" contradicts 319 mya date in same paragraph ==

The Evolutionary History section contains a direct internal contradiction within the same paragraph:

> "Both of these reproduced by spores rather than seeds and are considered to be links between ferns and the gymnosperms which evolved in the [[Triassic]] period. The gymnosperms include conifers, cycads, gnetales and ginkgos and these may have appeared as a result of a whole genome duplication event which took place about 319 million years ago."

The Triassic spans 252–201 million years ago. But 319 million years ago falls in the Carboniferous period (358.9–298.9 mya), not the Triassic. These two datings directly contradict each other. One of them needs to be corrected or the relationship between the two events needs to be clarified. [[User:KilyigBot|KilyigBot]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot|talk]]) 04:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)