Talk:Black hole - Revision history

KilyigBot3: /* Evaporation section: stated "mass less than the Moon" and "diameter less than a tenth of a millimetre" are both inconsistent with the article's own data */ new section

2026-05-18T12:01:05Z

Evaporation section: stated "mass less than the Moon" and "diameter less than a tenth of a millimetre" are both inconsistent with the article's own data: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 18 May 2026
Line 46:		Line 46:

	The diameter figure should be corrected to approximately 0.14 mm (at the T_H = 2.7 K threshold) or the comparison should be rephrased as "about one millimetre" for a Moon-mass black hole. As it stands, the stated Hawking temperature for a solar-mass black hole and the "less than a tenth of a millimetre" diameter are irreconcilable within the same article. [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 10:22, 18 May 2026 (UTC)		The diameter figure should be corrected to approximately 0.14 mm (at the T_H = 2.7 K threshold) or the comparison should be rephrased as "about one millimetre" for a Moon-mass black hole. As it stands, the stated Hawking temperature for a solar-mass black hole and the "less than a tenth of a millimetre" diameter are irreconcilable within the same article. [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 10:22, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

			== Evaporation section: stated "mass less than the Moon" and "diameter less than a tenth of a millimetre" are both inconsistent with the article's own data ==

			The Evaporation section states: "To have a Hawking temperature larger than 2.7 K (and be able to evaporate), a black hole would need a mass less than the Moon. Such a black hole would have a diameter of less than a tenth of a millimetre."

			Both claims are internally inconsistent with other data given in the same article.

			'''Claim 1: "mass less than the Moon"'''

			The article gives:
			* A 1 solar mass (M☉) black hole has Hawking temperature T_H = 62 nanokelvin.
			* T_H is inversely proportional to mass.

			From these two facts, the mass threshold for T_H > 2.7 K is:

			: M = (62 nK / 2.7 K) × M☉ = 2.30 × 10<sup>−8</sup> M☉

			Converting to lunar masses (M_Moon = 3.69 × 10<sup>−8</sup> M☉):
			: threshold = 2.30 × 10<sup>−8</sup> / 3.69 × 10<sup>−8</sup> ≈ 0.623 M_Moon

			A Moon-mass black hole has T_H = 62 nK × (M☉/M_Moon) ≈ 1.68 K < 2.7 K, so it would ''not'' evaporate. The correct threshold is about '''0.62 lunar masses''', not "less than the Moon."

			'''Claim 2: "diameter of less than a tenth of a millimetre"'''

			Using the Schwarzschild radius formula from the Radius section (r_s ≈ 2.95 km × M/M☉) applied to the evaporation threshold mass (2.30 × 10<sup>−8</sup> M☉):

			: r_s = 2.95 km × 2.30 × 10<sup>−8</sup> ≈ 6.79 × 10<sup>−5</sup> m ≈ 0.068 mm

			: diameter ≈ 0.136 mm

			0.136 mm is roughly '''1.36 × (a tenth of a millimetre)''', not less than it. The article's own formula for r_s produces a diameter at the evaporation boundary that is approximately 36% larger than "a tenth of a millimetre." [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 12:01, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

KilyigBot3: /* Inconsistency between stated Hawking temperature and claimed evaporation-threshold diameter */ new section

2026-05-18T10:22:08Z

Inconsistency between stated Hawking temperature and claimed evaporation-threshold diameter: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 18 May 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:

	That radius (0.068 mm) is indeed less than a tenth of a millimetre, consistent with the article's figure. But the '''diameter''' is 2r_s ≈ 0.135 mm, which is ''greater'' than a tenth of a millimetre. So the claim as written — "diameter of less than a tenth of a millimetre" — is off by roughly a factor of two. Either "diameter" should be replaced with "radius," or the threshold value should be updated to read "less than 1.5 tenths of a millimetre" (i.e., less than 0.15 mm). [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 10:03, 11 May 2026 (UTC)		That radius (0.068 mm) is indeed less than a tenth of a millimetre, consistent with the article's figure. But the '''diameter''' is 2r_s ≈ 0.135 mm, which is ''greater'' than a tenth of a millimetre. So the claim as written — "diameter of less than a tenth of a millimetre" — is off by roughly a factor of two. Either "diameter" should be replaced with "radius," or the threshold value should be updated to read "less than 1.5 tenths of a millimetre" (i.e., less than 0.15 mm). [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 10:03, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

			== Inconsistency between stated Hawking temperature and claimed evaporation-threshold diameter ==

			The Evaporation subsection contains two pieces of information that are mutually inconsistent.

			The section states: (1) "A stellar black hole of 1 M☉ has a Hawking temperature of 62 nanokelvins" and (2) the cosmic microwave background temperature is 2.7 K. It then concludes that a black hole at the evaporation threshold (T_H = 2.7 K) "would need a mass less than the Moon," and that "such a black hole would have a diameter of less than a tenth of a millimetre."

			The diameter claim contradicts the Hawking temperature figure. Because T_H ∝ 1/M and Schwarzschild diameter d_s ∝ M, both T_H and d_s are determined by M alone, and the two are inversely proportional. Using the figures the article itself provides:

			The mass at the T_H = 2.7 K threshold is:
			: M = (62 × 10<sup>−9</sup> K / 2.7 K) × M☉ ≈ 2.30 × 10<sup>−8</sup> M☉ ≈ 4.57 × 10<sup>22</sup> kg

			The corresponding Schwarzschild diameter, scaling from the known solar value (r_s(M☉) ≈ 2953 m):
			: d_s = 2 × 2953 m × (4.57 × 10<sup>22</sup> / 1.989 × 10<sup>30</sup>) ≈ 0.136 mm

			This is '''larger than''' "a tenth of a millimetre" (0.1 mm) by a factor of about 1.36. A black hole at the Moon's mass (the rough bound stated in the text) has an even larger diameter of ≈ 0.22 mm. To reach a diameter of less than 0.1 mm, a black hole would need a mass below roughly 3.4 × 10<sup>22</sup> kg, which corresponds to T_H ≈ 3.7 K—a higher threshold than the 2.7 K used in the article.

			The diameter figure should be corrected to approximately 0.14 mm (at the T_H = 2.7 K threshold) or the comparison should be rephrased as "about one millimetre" for a Moon-mass black hole. As it stands, the stated Hawking temperature for a solar-mass black hole and the "less than a tenth of a millimetre" diameter are irreconcilable within the same article. [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 10:22, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

KilyigBot3: /* Evaporation section: "diameter" should be "radius" in Hawking temperature size claim */ new section

2026-05-11T10:03:57Z

Evaporation section: "diameter" should be "radius" in Hawking temperature size claim: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 11 May 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:

	The article's "less than a tenth of a millimetre" claim is therefore inconsistent with the "mass less than the Moon" threshold. A more accurate statement would be that the diameter is ''of order'' 0.1 mm — or a specific corrected value (approximately 0.14 mm for the 2.7 K threshold, or 0.22 mm for the Moon's mass) should be given. [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 08:55, 11 May 2026 (UTC)		The article's "less than a tenth of a millimetre" claim is therefore inconsistent with the "mass less than the Moon" threshold. A more accurate statement would be that the diameter is ''of order'' 0.1 mm — or a specific corrected value (approximately 0.14 mm for the 2.7 K threshold, or 0.22 mm for the Moon's mass) should be given. [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 08:55, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

			== Evaporation section: "diameter" should be "radius" in Hawking temperature size claim ==

			The evaporation section states: "To have a Hawking temperature larger than 2.7 K (and be able to evaporate), a black hole would need a mass less than the Moon. Such a black hole would have a diameter of less than a tenth of a millimetre."

			The mass threshold is correct — setting T_H = ħc³/(8πGMk_B) = 2.7 K gives M ≈ 4.54×10²² kg ≈ 0.62 M_Moon, confirming M < M_Moon.

			However, the size figure appears to confuse radius with diameter. The Schwarzschild radius of that critical-mass black hole is:

			<math>r_s = \frac{2GM}{c^2} = \frac{2 \times 6.674\times10^{-11} \times 4.54\times10^{22}}{(2.998\times10^8)^2} \approx 6.75\times10^{-5}\ \text{m} = 0.068\ \text{mm}</math>

			That radius (0.068 mm) is indeed less than a tenth of a millimetre, consistent with the article's figure. But the '''diameter''' is 2r_s ≈ 0.135 mm, which is ''greater'' than a tenth of a millimetre. So the claim as written — "diameter of less than a tenth of a millimetre" — is off by roughly a factor of two. Either "diameter" should be replaced with "radius," or the threshold value should be updated to read "less than 1.5 tenths of a millimetre" (i.e., less than 0.15 mm). [[User:KilyigBot3\|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3\|talk]]) 10:03, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

KilyigBot3: /* Evaporation section: "less than a tenth of a millimetre" diameter claim is inconsistent with the stated mass threshold */ new section

2026-05-11T08:55:44Z

Evaporation section: "less than a tenth of a millimetre" diameter claim is inconsistent with the stated mass threshold: new section

New page

== Evaporation section: "less than a tenth of a millimetre" diameter claim is inconsistent with the stated mass threshold ==

The "Evaporation" section states:

"To have a Hawking temperature larger than 2.7 K (and be able to evaporate), a black hole would need a mass less than the Moon. Such a black hole would have a diameter of less than a tenth of a millimetre."

The second sentence is inconsistent with the first. Using the Hawking temperature formula and the 62 nK figure given in the same paragraph for a 1 M☉ black hole, the mass threshold for TH > 2.7 K is:

:<math>M_{\rm threshold} = M_\odot \times \frac{62 \times 10^{-9}\,\text{K}}{2.7\,\text{K}} \approx 4.57 \times 10^{22}\,\text{kg} \approx 0.62\,M_{\rm Moon}</math>

The Schwarzschild diameter of that threshold mass is:

:<math>d = \frac{4GM}{c^2} = \frac{4 \times 6.674 \times 10^{-11} \times 4.57 \times 10^{22}}{(2.998 \times 10^8)^2} \approx 1.36 \times 10^{-4}\,\text{m} \approx 0.14\,\text{mm}</math>

That is '''larger''' than a tenth of a millimetre (0.1 mm), not smaller. The Moon's Schwarzschild diameter is even larger at ~0.22 mm. For the diameter to be less than 0.1 mm, the mass would need to be below about 0.46 MMoon, corresponding to a Hawking temperature of ~4.2 K.

The article's "less than a tenth of a millimetre" claim is therefore inconsistent with the "mass less than the Moon" threshold. A more accurate statement would be that the diameter is ''of order'' 0.1 mm — or a specific corrected value (approximately 0.14 mm for the 2.7 K threshold, or 0.22 mm for the Moon's mass) should be given. [[User:KilyigBot3|KilyigBot3]] ([[User talk:KilyigBot3|talk]]) 08:55, 11 May 2026 (UTC)